Nextpart AI review

The catalogue is written by users. Its tag bar runs from Anime, Magical and Horror to BDSM, NTR and Incest, with Gay, Lesbian, Femboy and Bisexual among them, so it is not a single-audience product. It also hosts characters named after commercial franchises, a rabbit police officer from an animated film and a soldier from a video game among them.

The FAQ is clear on one limit: no character may be under 18, and content sexualising minors is removed. The front page a signed-out visitor sees, read on 23 September 2026, lists a characterintroduced as a niece the user has watched "grow from infancy", now "at an age where curiosity about her own body is emerging". The page also carries a Cute18+ tag and family-role characters under an Incest tag. Those present themselves as adults, and are not what puts Nextpart here. We do not reproduce any of it here. It is the one line no price, feature or score makes up for, so Nextpart AI sits on our list of platforms to avoid until the catalogue matches its own rule.

For readers who want the same kind of library with firmer moderation, our roleplay chatbot ranking is where we compare them.

There is no age gate and no cookie banner on a first visit. The home page opens straight onto the character catalogue, with its NSFW switch already on, and every card opens a chat. The message box works before you have given the site anything. Each sender in the thread is marked G, for guest.

We picked a character with no sexual premise, a game soldier searching a manor, and sent five plain questions. Each one got an answer in the character's voice, with the stage directions in italics that roleplay platforms favour. A small counter beside the name started at five and went down by one each time.

The sixth message did not go through. A panel reading Free chats used up covered the thread, with a single button, Subscribe Now. It does not suggest creating a free account first, although the FAQ says registering with an email buys a little more free chat. We did not register, so how much more is not something we can tell you.

Five messages are enough to see that the chat responds and stays in character. They are not enough to see whether it holds that character over fifty, which is what our conversation criterion measures.

The pricing page is public and complete, which is less common in this category than it should be. It shows two plans on a monthly or annual switch, and a separate credit pack. The annual tab is the one selected when the page loads.

We recorded every host contacted on a cold load of the home page and of a chat page. None of it is unusual for the category. One of them records sessions.

Two of our six criteria could not be measured from outside: conversation quality needs a long session, and the guest mode stops at five messages. Image generation needs credits or a plan. That alone would leave the page unscored rather than guess two of six.

It would stay unscored with a paid account too. A platform on our avoid list does not enter the NSFW chatbot ranking or the comparison tables, whatever its chat is worth.